Club Brugge +1.5
Archived odds 1.23
Best odds
Winamax1.23
Winamax1.23
PMU1.14Archived odds
Loading match details…
Loading match details…
This content was machine-translated from the French version.
PSVEindhoven
Club BruggeKV
Club Brugge +1.5
Archived odds 1.23
Winamax1.23PMU1.14Archived odds
Prediction: Club Brugge +1.5 · Handicap. Estimated probability: 79.7 %, based on market odds. No stake: this probability does not justify a bet at the available odds.
Read the full analysisPrediction: Club Brugge +1.5 · Handicap. Estimated probability: 79.7 %, based on market odds. No stake: this probability does not justify a bet at the available odds.
In the Champions League, PSV drew 1-1 with Shakhtar at home on 10 September, lost 0-1 at Leipzig on 13 October, then won 1-0 at Porto on 20 October. Club Brugge lost 2-3 to Aston Villa at home on 8 September, won 4-3 at Inter on 13 October, and beat Lens 3-0 at home on 21 October.
These European results are insufficient to establish the last five matches across all competitions, Club Brugge's domestic form, rest days, or comparable performance metrics.
PSV's match page mentions a previous meeting between the two clubs in 1990, in a friendly tournament, without a score provided in the consulted materials. No recent competitive meeting or encounter from the previous season is documented.
This precedent is too old and involves different squads and coaches to constitute a useful prédictive signal.
Ricardo Pepi had been announced as unavailable for several matches after an injury against Twente on September 22, but this information does not confirm his absence on November 4. On October 16, Peter Bosz indicated that Jerdy Schouten was undergoing a lengthy recovery and that Sami Ouaissa was returning to team training before playing with Jong PSV.
The complete list of PSV and Club Brugge absentees, as well as the status of the goalkeepers, remains unknown.
The favorable scenario for PSV is based on the pitch and its victory in Porto. However, on October 16, after Leipzig, Peter Bosz acknowledged that his team had enjoyed good spells of possession but not enough presence in the box: better occupation of the danger area and fewer turnovers could make its territorial control more productive.
The opposite scenario favors Club Brugge: its 4-3 win at Inter and 3-0 victory over Lens show recent European attacking output, and its transitions could exploit the spaces if PSV pushes forward. Nevertheless, the 2-3 home defeat to Aston Villa is a reminder that Club Brugge can come under heavy territorial pressure.
The likely stakes are improving their position in the qualifying zone for the playoffs, although the exact consequences cannot be determined before the other results from matchday 4.
No official lineup or press conference specific to this match was available as of 27 October 2026. The starters, goalkeeper, and any potential rotation remain to be confirmed.
Eleven from the previous match, against FC Porto on 20 October 2026
CoachP. Bosz
Eleven from the previous match, against Lens on 21 October 2026
CoachI. Leko
Bench
PSV EindhovenClub Brugge KV
RecordPSV Eindhoven · 0W · 1D · 1L
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts | W | D | L | BP | BC | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | +9 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 5 | WWW | |
| 2 | 3 | +9 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3 | WWW | |
| 3 | 3 | +5 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 7 | WWW | |
| 4 | 3 | +5 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | WWW | |
| 5 | 3 | +3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | WWW | |
| 6 | 3 | +5 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | DWW | |
| 7 | 3 | +4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | DWW | |
| 8 | 3 | +5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | LWW | |
| 9 | 3 | +5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | WLW | |
| 10 | 3 | +4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | WLW | |
| 11 | 3 | +3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | WWL | |
| 12 | 3 | +3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | LWW | |
| 13 | 3 | +1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | WLW | |
| 14 | 3 | +5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5 | DDW | |
| 15 | 3 | +3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | WLD | |
| 16 | 3 | +1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | DWL | |
| 17 | 3 | +1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | LWD | |
| 18 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | WLD | |
| 19 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | LWL | |
| 20 | 3 | -1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | WLL | |
| 21 | 3 | -1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | LLW | |
| 22 | 3 | -2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | WLL | |
| 23 | 3 | -3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | WLL | |
| 24 | 3 | -3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | WLLWL | |
| 25 | 3 | -3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | LWLWL | |
| 26 | 3 | -4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | LWL | |
| 27 | 3 | -4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | LLW | |
| 28 | 3 | -5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | LWLWW | |
| 29 | 3 | -5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | LLWWD | |
| 30 | 3 | -5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | LWL | |
| 31 | 3 | -6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | DLDWD | |
| 32 | 3 | -3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | DLL | |
| 33 | 3 | -4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 | LDLWD | |
| 34 | 3 | -4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | LLL | |
| 35 | 3 | -6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 10 | LLL | |
| 36 | 3 | -12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 13 | LLLWD |
